We are often the cause of our own
resentments.
I know I am. Perhaps there are things
I want to do but something holds me back. My own personality; my own
misperceptions; my own reluctances; messages from my parents, parts
of them that live on in me whether I like it or not. My own
laziness. My own comfort in the familiar. My own confusion over
what I can change and what I can't. My fears.
That's actually what I see when I see a
red stain over the middle of the country, broader in the middle and
the lower right of the picture, tapering in the less populous
mid-continent. Or when I hear about Arlie Hochshield's five years in
Louisiana with the left-out whites who think others are being taken
care of, but not them. Or about others who lurk about the South and
talk to Trump sign-displayers who still talk about the Communist New
York Times. I see Reagan voters, I see Bush voters, I see McCain and
Romney and now Trumpers who inexplicably vote for lower taxes on
others than themselves. I see What's The Matter With Kansas voters.
They resent what they have supported and still support and cause to
be perpetuated and I guess can't help themselves from doing it to
themselves.
Years ago I took a year and lived in
Sweden, doing research on medical care, and learning Swedish so I
could travel comfortably throughout the entire Swedish Empire, as I
joked at the time. If you don't learn the language of the country
you are in, it's hard to really be in the country you are in, and
it's good to use your brain even if it's hard going. But I was
surprised to see how easy Swedish is for English speakers, despite
the weird sing-song that I like so much. Unlike Asian and African
and Bushmen languages, there are so many cognates and the grammar is
straightforward for us. We hear that English is half Romance and
half Germanic, with other words thrown in from somewhere else, like
typhoon, and assassin. But the Germanic side of English isn't
actually German, it's Scandinavian, from the Vikings in the ninth and
tenth century – by the way, for a great read, read The Long Ships
by Frans Bengtssen (New York Review Books Classic, recommended by my
local bookseller Diesel Books, who said Michael Chabon loved it, and
I see why, after reading it). So Swedish has an eerie familiarity
for an English speaker.
I also read about 10 books on Sweden,
the first being a basic history of Sweden. What I didn't know was
that in the early days of the 20th century Sweden was
known as “fattig Sverige,” or “poor Sweden.” (“Sverige”
is Swedish for Sweden, and is pronounced “Sveria.”) That's why
we have so may Scandinavians in the upper Midwest; just as the Irish
fled the famine (and English oppression), the Swedes and Norwegians
fled poverty that had no obvious end in sight. The ostensible reason
I had gone to Sweden was to see how the Third Way (Marquis Childs'
term) worked. At the time that the imagination of most of the world
turned to Communism, the Swedish Social Democratic party, the
political arm of the Landsorganisation (the LO, pronounced
“landsorganisa-shoon”), had taken the country by the bootstraps
and booted up. They enforced equality, and education. As time went
by, they saw that they were a small country, a cold country, a
homogeneous country, a country with iron and lumber up north, and
fish, and about 6 million people when I was there, and an out of the
way country that no one had to cross to get to somewhere else. So if
they were going to make something of themselves, they would have to
do it by themselves, and they would have to think it through and
figure out what to inject to the world and how to do it.
So they did. They saw they had to
marshal their resources as they found them, and use their brains and
their self-discipline and their capacity for unity as enforced by a
dominant party. They had to target their shots and specialize in
what the world needed. To tell you the truth, I forget now exactly
what they found. Electrolux, that I remember. Forest products.
Steel. From Wikipedia: “motor vehicles, telecommunications,
pharmaceuticals, industrial machines, precision equipment, chemical
goods, home goods and appliances, forestry,
iron, and steel.”
But here's the point I'm trying to
make. They saw the need for self-discipline, education, pulling
together, and thinking things out. When they found what they thought
was their best shot, they went for it. And that effort had to be
extensive and people-centered. So they invested in training – they
paid for people to go to school. And they invested in moving people
around – they paid people to move, paid for new housing, and let
them spend supported time getting situated and learning their new
skills in these industries. Paid them not to work for a while.
So, guess what? It worked. Fattig
Sverige became fattig no more. It became a country that worked
because they tried to make it work, they dared, and they did it
through a state that people complained about, but that they supported
and paid lots of taxes to, and that was worthy of trust. Today
(well, in 2013), from The Local, a Stockholm publication:
“Sweden
has come in second place in a ranking of citizen well-being on the
OECD's
Better Life Index, beating its Scandinavian neighbours but still
outgunned on the happiness scale by the Australians.”
The United States has a long and
glorious history. We were poor, too. The colonists didn't have
much. Look at what they wore in the Civil War – God, they had
nothing! They had a couple of shirts and pairs of pants, maybe. And
yet the country came to prosper, led along a different path than
Sweden, rich in natural resources and a constantly enriched
population of ambitious immigrants who understood the need to learn a
new language, get educated, and work hard. World affairs helped as
Europe despoiled its own lands and industries and we had lots of
fields to ourselves. But when they regrew, we didn't see exactly how
we could target our shots forward. Almost inadvertently, it seems,
we enlarged our capacity by putting our women to work, and we are
now, certainly belatedly, starting to find strength in our formerly
excluded populations, our “minorities.” So progress is being
made.
But we are not biting the bullet the
way the Swedes did. Globalization and automation are here to stay,
and they should be. Imagine the backbreaking work of farming, or
mining, or working on the line. As Galbraith observed in his
autobiography, when he worked in the agricultural fields of Ontario,
he quickly found the attraction of “inside work,” on his road to
economics stardom. Who would want to go back to the past of
drudgery? Imagine if the fields could plow themselves, wouldn't that
be great? Yes, of course it would be, and it is, but the problem is,
who owns the means of production, who reaps the reward? Therein lies
the rub. How does one distribute the benefit?
You have to find a way that people who
are displaced get the benefit of the advancing technology. That was
the genius of Sweden. They did it in a social democratic way. They
took those displaced workers and made of them something else, not
usually economists, but technicians in other fields that needed
skilled workers. They paid for them, and the people put in the work.
That is precisely what the United States has not done.
We have instead followed a Conservative
line. We have kept our money from the state instead of investing in
our people through the state. We have neglected not only
transportation infrastructure, but people infrastructure. We have
said the government is the enemy. We – and I mean not me, not my
part of the country, but rather that red swatch of states from South
and Southwest up through the Midwest and Upper Midwest, and don't
forget coal country in West Virginia and Kentucky – have been
distrustful of government and instead voted for conservatives for 40
years at least. The Christian Coalition has been successful. The
governing group is not really a majority of the country, actually,
it's the residue of the constitutional compromise that ensconced the
Senate in the hands of the small states, that didn't foresee the
importance of cities and coastal states. My America would vote for
more training, for more support for the displaced, for rifling our
economic shots, at least I think we would. But the less than 1
million Wyomingites have two senators and disproportional power, and
so do the other red states. The South is still afraid that the money
would go to those more darkly hued than themselves. The Democratic
Party has been unable to muster the dominance the LO forged in
Sweden, the country has been unable to think of itself as homogeneous
in spirit, and those traditional populations in the South and the
Southwest and the Midwest and the Upper Midwest and coal country have
voted for lower taxes on others that they could have used to retrain
and relocate themselves. Even Democratic Presidents have had to
minimize their objectives. The Republicans have won, and whoopdedoo,
where are you now, my fellow Americans?
My wife says, yes, it's a shame where
they are economically, but what are they doing for themselves behind
their Trump front yard signs? Well, I answer, what can they do?
They don't have the schools and the training programs and the
relocation funds and help available to them. Not everyone can do it
for themselves, get themselves together and move to California or
wherever and pull themselves up all by themselves. Most people are
just average, and a fair percentage, I guess 49%, are below average.
I remember them from high school, giggling or hacking off over on the
side of the classroom. What were they ever going to make of
themselves, they who couldn't learn French very well or chemistry or
very much at all? They needed help then, and they need help now, and
they could get it if they were smart enough to know they weren't
smart and that they needed help.
Independence is great, I like it
myself, but sometimes it gets in the way. Sometimes you have to work
with others and trust, and sometimes you have to be smart enough to
see that the business school people, graduates of Wharton, are just
going to look after themselves. So you have to elect people to go
out and make sure you get taken care of, and then be willing to do
your part. You have to hang together and work together.
And sometimes you find that you can't.
You get deluded and you get seduced, your memories of your parents
and how they voted get in the way, and for 40 years or more you vote
for those who lie and cheat and steal and do business the way the
business schools taught them. But in the end, with all your
resentments at your lot in life, you have to look at yourself
straight and understand that, in the end, you did it to yourself.
And then you have to take yourself by the bootstraps, boot up, and do
for your children what your forefathers did for you, and start your
journey with a single step, and just change how you vote, and do what
you can do differently, if what you have been doing hasn't been
working for you. You have to turn the red stain blue, and do it by
the roots. The grass will always grow if you let it.
Budd Shenkin