Why are we all on earth any different from the Titanic?
We are all together headed toward a common fate, albeit with
different levels of comfort along the way. In fact, we on Earth are even more isolated than they were
on the Titanic. We are as
confident as they were in the indestructibility of our world, in our case
because we have always been safe so why would it change? They were assured they were safe,
despite iceberg sightings, because the Titanic was unsinkable.
From that perspective, as we go about out daily lives with
concerns for winding down wars, instituting a new health care system, fixing
economics, we are rearranging the deck chairs, because just as the Titanic was
sailing toward an iceberg and discounting the danger because they were
unsinkable, we are sailing toward climate change, aka global warming, aka a
disaster that will disrupt severely the world as we know it.
Why don’t we pay more attention? Why is it number 17 or something on the concerns of Americans? Are we the proverbial frogs in the
gradually heating water which will be boiled slowly?
Jared Diamond observed in Collapse that humans arriving on a
previously uninhabited island will kill and make extinct all the large animals
and some of the small ones, and cut down all the trees, and thus establish
their own demise or devolution into abject poverty. Why are more modern humans on the island named Earth any
different? In contrast to the
islanders, we have modern science which can foretell our demise or
devolution. But the bulk of
mankind does not listen. The
ignorant and the selfish – the 90% -- generally just deny. The science is bad, they think, or the
doomsayers discount the power of innovation. Well, the science isn’t bad, it’s good. Innovation can’t come fast enough
because of the lag in changing greenhouse gases; there is no vacuum cleaner for
carbon dioxide, and there will not likely be one anytime soon, especially as
population continues to increase and deforestation continues.
The United States needs to take responsibility. The advanced countries made the mess
and we should clean it up. But we
won’t. Nor will the aggressive
behemoth called China. It is a sad
day when such ignorance and selfishness triumphs. But there it is.
I don’t know what I can do individually, certainly nothing
significant, and I make my negative contribution as I fly here and there in
airplanes. But what would the
difference be if I stopped? I’m
not a saint, but probably we should try to go solar, turn off some appliances
in the Hawaii house while we’re not there. “Raise awareness.”
Obama is smart, although not scientific and certainly not
much of a leader of a country let alone the world. But where the hell is he? At the very least he could “raise awareness,” do his
executive actions, and make the case for the long term – and it’s not even so
long term at this point.
Jennifer Granholm has a great and innovative plan, not that
it would save us, but it’s something – do a Race to the Top for states to
innovate in clean energy, using corporate profit repatriation as a source of
funding: http://gspp.berkeley.edu/events/webcasts/a-clean-energy-proposal-race-to-the-top. She presented it to a group of us the
other night, but it was not going to politically popular with Republicans. And when she presented it to the Obama
Administration she was pooh-poohed, it seems.
I just read yesterday in Tom Friedman’s column about the
size of Syrian families – 16 children is not unusual. In the 70’s and 80’s health care improved but the practice
of having large families so that some survived has not yet relented. (I learned about this ironic phenomenon
of health improvement leading to more population and subsequent increased
impoverishment in medical school, in our public health club – it wasn’t
important enough to present to the general class, I guess.) Adjustment takes time, and there are
thus many more souls on our small planet to run out of water, food, and
probably firewood – although not coal perhaps. Nothing makes people more desperate and angry and violent
than hunger.
The dystopian future continues to beckon.
Budd Shenkin
Budd - if Climate Change is the worry - and I think it is as I live on the coast of NC 40 mi inland at an elevation of 8 ft - then the President needs to facilitate Nuclear power more than "Clean Coal". I really do not understand people who describe themselves as "environmentalists" but can't promote nuclear power. We would kill the planet before we'd give up air conditioning and it is tough to do A/C in the humid South with solar panels.... It does not matter if the half life of some fuels is 40,000 years if we can't make it 500. Just think how much carbon would have been avoided if we had focused on nuclear instead of adding ethanol to gas! Bad LUC!
ReplyDelete-Graham Barden
Graham - I agree with you, for the nth time. But disposition of waste has to be dealt with, proper operation in a non-Chernoble and non-Three Mile Island and non-Fukushima way, and cost of new facilities. I've just come upon a website to watch for climate change science - skepticalscience.com. I'm hoping to become better informed by following it.
ReplyDeleteBudd
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete