Sometimes, you just don't where it will come from. My favorite book for this summer is The Weight of Ink by Rachel Kadish. The name “Kadish” is probably not familiar to you, but it's the name of one of my best friends in medical school, Larry Kadish. We were guards together on many a basketball team. We worked well together, mutual respect and affection. He told me, one of the great compliments of my life, that I could be hung over, exhausted, or sick, no matter, I would always get my points. How can I not love Larry?
Then,
halfway through med school he married one of our classmates, Anna
Stein, from New York, but before that from Holocaust Poland to the US
through the Eastern route. At our reunion in June, I told Anna that
I played cards with a fellow Jewish pediatrician who was from
Shanghai originally, and I had told him that my classmate Anna had
escaped through China. “Japan,” she said, “but close enough.”
I
still feel a little guilty that when Anna went into labor and I had
volunteered to stay with Larry while she was in labor – in those
days I had the idea that men stayed outside the delivery room and
smoked, although neither of us did, but maybe we would – but when
she went into labor I was at home in Philadelphia and missed my
support role, which was big in my eyes. I called Larry a few years
ago to apologize, get it off my chest. “That's OK,” said Larry,
“I really don't remember anything about it (about my promise to be
there, not the birth).” Maybe I wasn't as central to that story as
I thought I was.
So,
Larry and Anna have a daughter, Rachel. I don't even know which
child she is, 1, 2, 3, or 4, but she's in there somewhere. And it
turns out she is a writer of novels. They have admirable restraint
and didn't go all around the reunion saying that their daughter's
book was coming out, after 12 years of working on it, at least not to
me, but Ann finally couldn't help it, she posted the link to a New
York radio interview of Rachel on our class listserve, not saying
anything, just posting it. (www.wnyc.org/story/weight-ink/)
Out
of loyalty to them I felt I had to listen, and the book sounded
interesting and she sounded charming and intelligent and winning,
although if she weren't their kid I wouldn't have voluntarily picked
up a book about a blind Jewish rabbi and his female scribe in 17th
century London. But I then ordered it on Amazon and put it ahead of
finishing my current book, the newest Hitler biography (it's very
good – hadn't really understood at all about the Beer Hall Putsch
and Weimar Germany).
But
then as I read, I found that I couldn't put it down. It's just one
of those books you hope to find, a book that you hurry through to the
end because you can't put it down but that you don't want to really
end. A book that you want to keep with you if you can, maybe just to
be able to look at its cover. Twelve years, and it reads not at all
like the ponderous title of weighty ink, but flowing sentences, good
sentences, and an intricate plot that connects all the way through –
at least I think it does, I'm not real good on plot lines.
It's
one of those books that alternates chapters of two different stories
that are connected. One is the accidental discovery in 2001, in a
house dating from the 17th
century, as it is being redone and updated to greet the public as a
museum, of a set of manuscripts from that period. The owner calls
his old medieval history professor, Helen Watt, a seemingly severe
English woman about to retire, who we find has a history of being a
gentile in the new Jewish land of Israel where she fell in love with
an Israeli and loves him still, although in
absentia, since it
didn't work out. She recruits an American Jewish doctoral candidate,
Aaron Levy, to help her. Both are fluent in English, Hebrew,
Portuguese, and Latin, I think, and they piece together the meaning
of the documents and the history of the people, as they battle in the
competitive academic bureaucracy. It is the find of a lifetime, this
set of manuscripts of the letters of the rabbi and household
accounts. Gradually they piece together the story.
We,
however, know much more than they do, because every other chapter
traces the life of the rabbi and, more centrally, the scribe, Ester
Velasquez, both of whom were exiled from Portugal, the rabbi blinded
by the Inquisition, then to Amsterdam, and thence to London in the
continuing diaspora. London accepted Jews under Cromwell, perhaps
for the business, perhaps because the Bible foretold that the Messiah
will appear only when Jews are everywhere. A great picture of what
life must have been like for these Jews, the women working hard in
the houses and aspiring to little but husbands, the wealthy and the
poor living very different lives, the continuing value of learning,
life as it must have been lived in the Interregnum and the
Restoration. But the excitement of the 17th
century story is not only the personal stories – which are good –
but the intellectual progress of Ester, and through her, letting us
see what the Jews were thinking about, and contending about. Letters
go out to many of the well known intellectuals with Ester's
razor-sharp questions and logic, to be answered by some, including
Spinoza. She resists marriage as it would be a cage, at least until
the great plague, and then the fire. It's a compelling, compelling
story.
Helen
and Aaron, meanwhile, have their own trials to endure, they own paths
to follow, their own dilemmas to be faced, their own characters to be
probed. The introverted English and the extroverted American,
familiar territory, but wonderfully evolved. And in both parallel
stories, there is so much of the lives of women, and men, and the
process of choosing a mate for feeling and the risks of doing so, and
chance, and the continuing story of the Jews, of whom I am one but of
which I know so little. I knew in theory what a feat it has been to
keep a people alive as a people for eons without a homeland to live
in, but this book lets me see that a lot more clearly. It's a
serious book, but an intimate one, with continuously touching
stories, the kind where you want to break the fourth wall and talk to
them. This daughter of Larry and Anna can write.
And
then I finished and I reread the comments on the book cover. The
front cover has from Toni Morrison: “A gifted writer, astonishingly
adept at nuance, narration, and the politics of passion.” I hadn't
thought about passion having politics, but now that she points it
out, I guess that's right. The back cover has compliments from five
authors, and it was only at that point that I realized they were all
women. What I had read and loved was a feminist book! Yes, I
realized all the way through that she did women better than men, but
I hadn't realized that so much of what she was writing about was the
plight of women, and the over-weaning nature of so many of the men,
although there were good ones, to be sure. But we don't see them as
intimately as the women. How come I didn't notice?
Well,
I don't notice a lot of things, and when it comes to fiction, I'm no
expert, I'm more of an “I like it” kind of guy. Although when
pressed, I guess I can hold my own. And I do hope I get pressed on
this one, because I think it's a deep, rich book, one that can stand
a lot of examination and discussion, and a lot of love.
I
wish I could say that is the child whose birth I missed, but probably
not, probably a later one. But whatever, even though I don't see
them much, these are my dear friends, my classmates, and they have
birthed and nurtured someone who has worked so very hard at her craft
to be able to produce such a book, and worked very hard to learn
enough to produce this very one. As I wrote to Larry and Anna when I
was on about page 75, I think this should be a National Book Award
contender. I'll stick with that.
Larry,
it might be true that I will always get my points, but Rachel has
just racked up a lot more than I ever could.
Budd
Shenkin
This is from Jeff Banchero, after our book club meeting discussing the Weight of Ink. Held in November, we always meet in this month at the French Club in San Francisco:
ReplyDeleteI finished the Weight of Ink only after our French Club event. It was a slow roll for me at the start, especially the long, early Dror interlude in Israel. London and the plague fared much better.
I declined years ago to remain unbiased when it comes to art, literature, or music created by my friends and family; of course, this is easier if you know James Joyce as opposed, say, to a Millenial slam-poet of uncertain talent. You don’t have to face this question, because on any level, your friend’s daughter’s novel is a wonderful achievement. You call it a feminist novel. I think it is, but as Spinoza, van den Enden, Hobbes, or Ester Velasquez might ask, why is this so? The characters, the timbre of the prose, the plot? I think it’s because of the strength of Ester’s interior monologue, which I wanted to be a part of. Lou said the reader might have to be Jewish to understand all of the nuance. When I phrased this question to the group at the FC, I did not receive a definitive answer. Yes and no, I would say. Each reader brings to a novel a different set of experiences. A Rabbi might have more background on the depth of Rivka’s soul, but I might have more as it relates to Thomas’s deciding to steer the boat through the rapids under London Bridge after May tells him she is pregnant. I have no doubt you were meant to be at the author’s birth.
Jeff
ชอบบล็อกของคุณ บทความดีมากๆๆ
ReplyDeleteคาสิโนออนไลน์
maxbet
m8bet
I got good ideas from this amazing blog.
ReplyDeleteI have read your article, it is very informative and helpful for me
เนื้อเพลงประกอบซีรีย์
เนื้อเพลงลูกทุ่ง
Grammar
นานาสาระ
OK
ReplyDeleteหวยไทยรัฐ