I was born in 1941, just three weeks
before Pearl Harbor, 12 years after the Depression started, and 24
years after the October Revolution. My parents were first generation
Jewish-Americans in Philadelphia, my father a doctor with,
apparently, a history in his family of radicalism on his father's
side, at least that's what I came to believe when we decided that I
would not be Bar-Mitzvahed, a distinction that had also eluded my
father. They were avowed Jews, yes, decidedly, but also not
observant, unless eating together on Jewish holidays counts as being
observant. Someone in his family, my father said, thought that
religions led to war. Maybe they were European radicals, I really
don't know. But I also suspected that paying lots of money for a
party for induction into something he didn't believe in didn't make
sense to them. “Them,” because my mother concurred, although her
family was more conventional, and indeed when it was revealed to my
mother's father that I would go un-Bar-Mitzvahed, he called me to him
at the dining table, in the presence of my father and mother, and
told me of his disappointment, which made my mother tell him to stop,
which made him say that he just wanted me to know how he felt. My
mother didn't get on so well with her parents, although we went to
their house regularly for Sunday dinner.
My father (born 1915) and my mother
(born 1918) became radicals in the 1930's, in the midst of the Great
Depression. I don't know the details, but I do know that pretty much
all their old friends, with whom they got together regularly and with
whom I became acquainted, had been radicals, too. “Radicals” in
those days meant communists. Whether or not they were official party
members I don't know, but maybe they were. In those days being a
commie was different from what it became later, but the horrors of
Communism took some time to be evident, and people adjusted at
different rates. My parents adjusted at an OK rate, and I think that
by the early 50's they had become just liberal Democrats, but they
were frightened by the Commie witch hunt – there really was a witch
hunt then, as you know – and my sisters tell me that the FBI nosed
around questioning other doctors about my father at the hospital and
there must have been others that we don't know about.
So when I was 10 or 11 or I guess
older, I was used to people having a political consciousness,
although I can't recall details. My folks were not like how Bobby
Fischer's family was portrayed in the Bobby Fischer movie, not at
all; Bobby's family were redder and true believers, not so thoughtful
as my parents and their friends, and a lot more recalcitrant. But I
was aware of politics, and I was aware of the Russians, and it was
serious stuff. Somehow, I remember getting a lot of information from
perhaps Time Magazine, even though we didn't take Time. I knew the
names and characteristics of all the Russian leaders, all of them.
And I knew pretty much about ICBM's, so I guess that was actually
later in the 50's. But it was serious stuff. Much later, in 1994, I
spent two weeks with a Children's Hospital mission in St. Petersberg
– no longer Leningrad – and on a day off happened into a museum
display of all the pictures of leaders of the party congresses, all
up in very large scale on the walls, no pictures allowed. I
recognized pretty much all of them.
One night in 1953 we were watching
television in our house at 47th and Osage in West
Philadelphia, it could have been You Bet Your Life with Groucho Marx
on the tube, and there was a cut into the show by the network to
announce that Joseph Stalin had died, repeat, Joseph Stalin has died,
and now back to your show. My father turned to my mother – my
father would have been all of 38 years old, my mother 35, and I was
12, and my siblings 9, and 6 and 4 – and they knew that it was a
momentous event, certainly for them, but they thought also for the
world, and I'm sure they were right. And my father said to my mother
something about how big an event it was, and how they had experienced
it in their lives. Then he said, as he was wont to do, “Do you
think the children will remember?” Then they answered the
question, “Buddy probably will.” And of course that is what
cemented it in my mind.
What a time, and what an event.
Everyone was very serious, the world was serious, the two world wars
and the Depression and the Cold War and the atomic bomb and
revolution and what else would there have had to have been for things
to be serious? Nothing more, obviously, nothing at all.
And now here we are in 2018 and things
are still serious, the Russians have new players who are serious and
Trump is a seriously destructive ignoramus and authoritarianism is on
the rise around the world and there is no reason in the world not to
take everything very seriously indeed. Quite. Except for this: this
2017 British movie I just saw on the plane going home from Stockholm,
The Death of Stalin, is a recreation of the time of Stalin's death,
and the events depicted are basically true, except that the movie is
an uproarious comedy. I couldn't believe it. I can't believe it.
It's very funny! I think it's a great movie! I'd like to give it an
Oscar, except that who cares about Oscars now, they're so arbitrary,
and I guess i was last year, anyway. Despite my own ignorance of the
film I see from IMDB that it got a bunch of awards, which is great.
So let me cheer now! https://www.imdb.com/title/tt4686844/.
(Also, see the interesting user reviews there on IMDB.)
I guess it's the same genre as Dr.
Strangelove, except the musical background is so prominent, giving it
a sprightly feel throughout, and lighter with English actors
including Michael Palin, and a Monty Python feel. How can you have a
comedian playing Lavrenti Beria (Simon Russell Beale – hilarious!),
you ask? So do I. How can lists of those to be collected that night
to be given to sadistic police, and how can we see people on that
list be taken away to be jailed and shot, and how can the music still
be sprightly and the mood comedic? I don't know how, but there it
is, and it's not tragic, and in fact it's in service of the
hilarious.
How can the Presidium members be
portrayed by the likes of Steve Buscemi and Jeffrey Tambor as Georgy
and Nicky with an air of Monty Python Keystone Cops, but with Buscemi
and Tambor doing their recognizable schticks? There must have been a
fair amount of actor input allowed by the director Armando Iannucci.
How can torture administered personally by Beria and his subsequent
murder by the Presidium be light? Good directing. How can the
Presidium meetings be portrayed as one IMDB user review puts it: “The
committee room scenes in particular are a riot of jockeying for
position, snide remarks and politicking of the highest, or should
that be lowest, order?” The director's TV background helps.
It's all absurd. Montaigne has a whole
essay on how the experience of death and sickness doesn't depend on
the events themselves, but the way we frame them. Maybe that's the
ticket. I wish my father could see it now, and my mother. My mother
was fond of saying, “What was I thinking?” Maybe I would hear
that again. Or maybe they would think their lives were being
diminished. No, now that the world had moved on and they were safe
and they saw their youthful enthusiasms and idealism for what it was,
they would laugh and wonder, just as their loyal son did.
My advice: see the movie, it's really
terrific. Then imagine how someone could make a similar movie about
Trump in real time. Would that be hilarious! Except for the world
burning up and the nukes, I guess. But that's what we need, that's
what you have to do with someone stupid and terrible, I think. High
and low comedy, just laugh at the stupid ass. Laughing all the way
to the ballot box.
Budd Shenkin
No comments:
Post a Comment