OK,
Meryl Streep is a wonderful actress, a very smart and eloquent lady.
But I think her Golden Globes statement, while striking and eloquent,
was a strategic mistake. And here's why – because it puts style
over substance, and not everybody agrees with putting down Trump's
style.
Trump
is gauche. He's crass. Trump sounds like and often acts like he's
from the construction yard, from Queens. Despite his wealth, he
seems to act in a way we could see a working class person acting.
He's not dumb, but he's not nuanced. He's gruff. He doesn't have
the manners one associates with wealth, let's put it that way – the
way Romney acted and sounded.
But
think of the people who voted for him, the “undereducated.” Many
of these people are just repelled by the pretension we see in the
classes with money. And I mean, repelled. The Sheryl Sandberg's
speak to a certain, privileged class. How to relate to the nanny and
keep her away from your husband can be a major concern.
I don't
know where the populism comes from in Trump. People are often loyal
to their origins. Sports stars “give back” to their home towns
-- Damian Lillard comes back to Oakland High and dedicates a gym;
Dramond Green goes back to Saginaw . My wife's ex-husband isn't an
athlete, but his loyalty to his family origins led him to establish a
non-profit that gives computers to poor families in Oakland.
Others
are quiet about their loyalty. The Millionaire Next Door kind of
person just keeps on living his or her life and piles up the money
and then gives it away at the end. Why change a winning game, they
figure, I guess. They're happy as they are.
Could
Trump's populist attachment be sincere? He himself comes from
wealth, but he also comes from Queens, and he has liked to hang out
in the construction yards. Maybe, or more probably he just found it
in his search for fame and adulation and improvised. Maybe he grew
up somehow hearing the Borsht Belt and that's where he got his
shtick. Trump is actually faux risen. He acts as though he is
giving it back to The Man, as he cheats and bullies his contractors.
Then he acts like the avatar of getting back to his roots.
But the
fact that he is an imposter isn't the point right now; I just got
diverted. The point is, he has carried it off. In his manners and
his social defiance and his strong id, he has made many of that
oppressed class identify with him. That's the point. He channels
resentment, and when Meryl and Hillary and the pathetic Jenn Palmieri
try to point out his grossness, the oppressed class responds – up
yours! You who have it made, you the ladies who lunch, we're going
to listen to you? Crotch grabbing and poor taste is your concern –
we're concerned about our jobs and getting paid and our husbands lack
of prospects. Don't complain to us about how you might feel
disrespected, thank you very much.
This
fight over manners is self-defeating. The more the fight is over
manners, the more separation of classes there will be, and the more
perception of hypocrisy.
Instead,
I think one just has to accept the Jacksonian manners. Let the
reaction be what it will be. Instead, one has to concentrate on
policies. Trump's and Ryan's and Republican policies are atrocious.
Don't think people are so dumb they can't see that. It just has to
be laid out and explained. And it would be best if it were explained
by someone with a working class sound. Bernie Sanders' background
isn't working class, but his gruff manner has a sound that resonates
to many. It's direct, it's low-pitched, it's intentionally
simplifying to make the point. (It's an open question how simple
Sanders actually thinks it is – Barney Frank told me he thinks
Sanders isn't very smart, but Frank is so partisan....) I'm not
suggesting that Bernie be the spokesman, but plainspokenness is
essential.
In
telling the truth as simply as possible, it can be personified in
Trump and the hateful Ryan and then the billionaires who turn out to
be hateful. Here's how they are hypocritical and screwing you! Have
someone use the word “fucking” and be caught by a “secret open
mike.” “Those fucking bastards are screwing the people – how
the hell are we going to make that case so that people hear and
understand it?”
Find
the messenger – and it's not Meryl Streep, and it's not Elizabeth Warren. Warren is eloquent and
smart, she even has that humble background, but she's from Harvard and it
shows. It needs to be someone like Harold Hughes from Iowa used to
be. Or patrician FDR, who knew how to relate, because he really was
a man of the people in Warm Springs, Georgia, where he invited
everyone into the water with him, to help each other with their polio.
To be
simple: Stick to the issues, man. And find a voice of the people.
Obama was pretty close; it's too bad he didn't after-sell. Find
someone who can, now.
Budd
Shenkin
Thank you for your post. I agree with a lot of your points, but as to who the Democrats might want to run in 2020, I think we need a candidate with celebrity status. One person I keep thinking about is George Clooney. Unfortunately the electorate seem to want someone with 'star' appeal. I am not even sure he would run, he seems intelligent, and the fact that he speaks his mind makes him appealing to those who wanted to elect an "outsider" . Clooney's wife is quite accomplished and would be an interesting First Lady too. I remember when Reagan was elected, somehow voters felt he would be 'different' due to the fact that he was outside of the political realm. Arnold Schwarzenegger benefited from this same (bizarre) theory when he was elected Governor of California. I hope we democrats can find someone who appeals to those voters AND has the intelligence and the energy to seek good guidance and counseling to bring he or she up to speed quickly for the job.
ReplyDeleteInteresting point. Get an actor (or actress) who can politic, or a politician who can act (or with comedic chops, like Obama.) I think it's possible that Obama will be central, given his cerebral capacity and huge approval numbers -- he can chart a course and help find some candidates, perhaps.
Delete