It's always been tough being a liberal
on crime and gangs. It's true that these miscreants have had really
hard lives in many instances. Being raised in a poor and
disorganized family with a history of failure is hard for me to
understand fully, and I'd guess it's the same for most of you reading
this. The social and educational resources offered to the poor are
dreadful, as we all know, and prejudice makes it all the harder in
every way.
And in addition to circumstances,
there's the problem for many of not having much personal potential.
We have some elements of a meritocracy in this country, more in
theory than in fact, but it's there. So, what about the 50% who are
below the mean in various measures? Those afflicted with poor brains
or poor bodies or illnesses? Sure, many are not good in one thing
but good in another, that's true. We make a mistake if we are
unidimensional. Sure, hard work and persistence will get you a lot,
and just reliability gets you a lot. But as Bernie and Elizabeth and
Barack and others aver, the deck is stacked. Jared Kushner didn't
get to be worth billions because of his innate brilliance, I think we
can agree and think that this will become all the more clear as
events unfold.
So, what are you going to do if your
way is blocked by so many obstacles? Some are gifted with optimism
and happiness and relilience and succeed despite the obstacles. But
most don't. And pressures can mount, from here and from there. In
the end, the rule of law and the arms of the police are necessary.
And some of these dudes are really bad, too, let's not bleed our
hearts for them. My stepson Brian is a prosecutor in Santa Clara
county, and had the same job in San Francisco, working on gangs in
both venues, and the evidence he sometimes brings to the court is
video taken by the accused of he himself torturing and murdering a
victim. Not much ambivalence on display there. If we are weighing
influences vs. free will, it's pretty hard to gather up the sympathy
when you hear Brian talk about these guys.
Perhaps you wonder where I'm going with
this. Amazingly, I'm meandering over to the subject of abject victim
of circumstances Donald Trump. We all know the problems that the
rich may encounter. No one is immune to illness, and Donald is no
doubt a victim of both ADHD and learning disorders (probably reading
deficiency, possibly from dyslexia), and it would seem from the
vision we have been offered of the prime source of his medical care
(Dr. Harold Bornstein) that none of this, plus much else, has been
properly dealt with. We can also imagine the circumstances of his
upbringing. Having a slumlord for a father probably did not
introduce liberal, understanding values to young Donald, and one
doubts that his medical deficiencies were sympathetically considered.
Plus, he was probably pretty much as much of a prick then as he
obviously is now.
At the time he was growing up we
understood so much less about it medically. My high school friend
Jonny couldn't finish homework until 1 AM, and his neighbor and
intimate friend John joked that that was when we didn't even have
anything assigned. We viewed it as a deficiency of organization or
of self-discipline or something, although we all loved him. It was
only in later adulthood that amphetamine medication made him
functional, and even now reading puts him to sleep. But, Jonny
persisted and is a radiologist. He had something going for him,
however: a supportive family. His father was a religious scholar,
and his mother one of those warm, Jewish mothers who overflowed with
affection for her son. When Jonny appeared on the front page of the
Philadelphia Bulletin as a soldier who was refusing to be shipped off
to Vietnam, the Bulletin interviewed his mother, who said “he is
such a wonderful boy!” And not only did Jonny benefit directly
from this family, he passes it on and lives his life the same way he
was treated, thoughtfully, warmly, compassionately. He should be
taking some amphetamines but I don't think he is. Luckily, those
xray films don't put him to sleep the way books do.
Donald, we can imagine, got none of
what Jonny did. He got shipped off to military school, and instead
of standing up for himself during Vietnam, he got deferred, as did so
many who could. But there probably was very little humanism from his
family to introject. From the way he bullies, one can imagine he was
bullied. His father probably found him wanting. Donald always made
sure he had a great looking date at school functions. He certainly
learned to compete in sports. That was him, trying to measure up,
trying to have a positive self-image from the outside in. That
usually doesn't work too well.
So here we are with a President Trump
who reveals himself everyday as an awful human being. Let me not
count the ways; who can't do it for himself or herself at this point?
No videos of torture and murder, but he edges up to it. Not just a
horrible President, who has the opposite of grace, the opposite of
understanding, who knows little and learns little and who is unlikely
to ripen in office. He has already shriveled, a fitting twin for
Jeff Sessions. Once you're there, there is no going back.
So, we once again confront the
Liberal's Dilemma. Do we understand and excuse, or do we capture and
prosecute? It is a testament to their hypocrisy that the Republican
Party of today says – excuse! He's new on the job, he means well,
etc. Of course, it's a load of horse-diggy. They will say just
anything, won't they? What a collection of losers, devoted to Wealth
Care. They decry the lazy (and the sick, for that matter) while they
defend the Loser In Chief.
But what do we do, we who are more
enlightened, who can understand how people can go wrong, and can
empathize with their hardships and dilemmas? Do we want to be
hypocrites, too?
Well, let me tell you where I come out.
Personally, I support Brian's point of view. Whatever the
background explanation, whatever the mix of determination vs.
freewill, I'm coming out with a judgement. Gang member killers?
Gotta lock'em up, no? What other way is there? Try to rehabilitate
when inside – tragedy and scandal how that doesn't happen – but
condemnation is necessary.
Consistency demands that we judge the
afflicted Donald the same way. It's very hard to grow up with the
family we intuit that he had, the pressures, and the illnesses that
he still seems not to recognize, but in the end, he has to be
condemned as a terrible human being, and I would be far from dismayed
if, in the end, the judge were to say, “Lock him up.”
Budd Shenkin
No comments:
Post a Comment